Having only seen a small portion and the conclusion of the Rice testimony it strikes me that they are still on thin ice. They look back at the need for a war footing. They achieved the need for a war footing.
There was a failure of intelligence and the structure of communications. The story begins there.
Taking responsibility would reduce the finger pointing. Finger pointing avoids responsibility. Denying either does both. They seem to only focus on avoiding while laying it, another chicken or the egg controversy.
Denying that a silver bullet could have prevented 9-11 avoids the fact that any actions taken on some information could have caused more than they could know to flip. Jumping to the assumption that there will be a mushroom cloud unless actions are taken, is a flop.
Something must change but without full debate it will not be for the better. That something must change does not mean that a better job could not have been done.
Maybe someone's thinking must change. Maybe it was already wrong.
To make substantial changes based on failure cannot guarantee seeing a silver bullet when you are lost in a mushroom cloud.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query silver. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query silver. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, April 08, 2004
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
How can one make light of a tragedy?
By looking for a silver lining. I think that is what we all want to do. We just have different perspectives on what preemptive is. But remember the silver lining requires a cloud and a light and it is always darkest before the dawn.(Not.)
My original trigger for this thought was a satire on the recent Seahawks loss in Chicago. But please note that my weapon of choice is words and I often have too full a tool box and grab the wrong instrument. But there is a difference between a target and a gun sight and I am sure that they meant surveyors or navigational equipment. Then there is the questionable use of a muzzle.
Back to Seattle: I feel I cost the Seahawks the game by not wearing my cap till the third quarter or so. But then maybe it was in the cards, or the hand of Chicago that was dealt. If these three downs aren't enough then Plato is a hail Mary and there is nothing wrong with the school of hard knocks.
Who let the dogs out? Not Pavlov.
[As for questionable sources: here are some earliest comment.
And more recent.]
[Speaking of rhetorical change*... what about repeal of the Dole-Romney Healthy Deficit Reduction Act, aka Obamacare.]
*see recent link 29:20 and 38:20.
My original trigger for this thought was a satire on the recent Seahawks loss in Chicago. But please note that my weapon of choice is words and I often have too full a tool box and grab the wrong instrument. But there is a difference between a target and a gun sight and I am sure that they meant surveyors or navigational equipment. Then there is the questionable use of a muzzle.
Back to Seattle: I feel I cost the Seahawks the game by not wearing my cap till the third quarter or so. But then maybe it was in the cards, or the hand of Chicago that was dealt. If these three downs aren't enough then Plato is a hail Mary and there is nothing wrong with the school of hard knocks.
Who let the dogs out? Not Pavlov.
[As for questionable sources: here are some earliest comment.
And more recent.]
[Speaking of rhetorical change*... what about repeal of the Dole-Romney Healthy Deficit Reduction Act, aka Obamacare.]
*see recent link 29:20 and 38:20.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Third Time's The Charm
[Finally posted 3-14-11 ]
Three times lucky? Actually I have not been lucky in finding the origin of the first, but I have been several times knocked off course. Just as I wrote this the news was noting the passing of a local law enforcement officer who had three centers of gravity, friends, family and work, so is that the message? "Every cloud has a silver lining" has also recently infiltrated my blog. That is credited roughly to John Milton and Katty Macane.
Numbers may play a big part in superstitions, but they also may play a big part in meanings. Past, present and future is just one case for threes, though not necessarily in that order, and this is not just to play with words. Of course if superstitions play any part in society, they will play a part in words, and words play a part in meanings, but which comes first? Some of this math and meandering came to my attention in regards to politics. Have you heard of the third way? The Clinton Adminstration was the first occasion I became aware of it in a political form, not that I had done the math in regard to other departments. But basically there are the two ends of the political spectrum and then there is the centrist. But is it the people, the target or the answers that are there? Or is it target, people or answers...who knows? However at this time I intend to apply it to the topic of navigation, or at least The Myth of Triangulation and wonder if a silver lining plays into any of this. While it is plane* to see where three plays into many things, it should suffice to read Robert Reich's article yourself as I have now read it twice. But I have yet to revisit the concept of navigation itself or any application of the tetrahedron to other perspectives of improving on our picture.
*pun on points
Three times lucky? Actually I have not been lucky in finding the origin of the first, but I have been several times knocked off course. Just as I wrote this the news was noting the passing of a local law enforcement officer who had three centers of gravity, friends, family and work, so is that the message? "Every cloud has a silver lining" has also recently infiltrated my blog. That is credited roughly to John Milton and Katty Macane.
Numbers may play a big part in superstitions, but they also may play a big part in meanings. Past, present and future is just one case for threes, though not necessarily in that order, and this is not just to play with words. Of course if superstitions play any part in society, they will play a part in words, and words play a part in meanings, but which comes first? Some of this math and meandering came to my attention in regards to politics. Have you heard of the third way? The Clinton Adminstration was the first occasion I became aware of it in a political form, not that I had done the math in regard to other departments. But basically there are the two ends of the political spectrum and then there is the centrist. But is it the people, the target or the answers that are there? Or is it target, people or answers...who knows? However at this time I intend to apply it to the topic of navigation, or at least The Myth of Triangulation and wonder if a silver lining plays into any of this. While it is plane* to see where three plays into many things, it should suffice to read Robert Reich's article yourself as I have now read it twice. But I have yet to revisit the concept of navigation itself or any application of the tetrahedron to other perspectives of improving on our picture.
*pun on points
Friday, January 06, 2012
Neo-Perspectivism
It is hard to say which niche this arises from.**
Neo-Nuanced is one trigger.***
Even if retro actively.
No silver bullet.
(Or Lone Ranger)
(I, II, III, IV, Not nor note.)
(Far From It)
Less embedded:
It is not just to Pop Culture but social engineering.
If that is an aphorism, you have one hint.(ouch)
But Freud and Hitler were both Austrian,
but the latter-day Austrians are economic transcendentalists.*
(Emerson, Niche& Rand?)
Some credit may be due to "Plato Not Prozac."
[Just in.]
***
Notes to Asterisk Readers:
It may help the flow if one reads the asterisks in order and after a full read of this piece, but scrolling over links as one goes will be useful.
* no Emerson
** last link inserted: Maybe way too much of a D'Ribble or G'Ribble?
[Apologies for Neo-Euphemism.]
[Breaking News: Herman Cain will give an "unconventional Endorsement just prior to the South Carolina Primary. (Ctrl F "best" under vent) I hope it is not another one of his tours or projects, but if it is not a third party run or candidate it might be someone from out of the blue if not a write-in. Huntsman or Bachmann also come to mind.]
*** The irony of taxes, GDP and debt. Is it in the charts?
> Previous Post <
Neo-Nuanced is one trigger.***
Even if retro actively.
No silver bullet.
(Or Lone Ranger)
(I, II, III, IV, Not nor note.)
(Far From It)
Less embedded:
It is not just to Pop Culture but social engineering.
If that is an aphorism, you have one hint.(ouch)
But Freud and Hitler were both Austrian,
but the latter-day Austrians are economic transcendentalists.*
(Emerson, Niche& Rand?)
Some credit may be due to "Plato Not Prozac."
[Just in.]
***
Notes to Asterisk Readers:
It may help the flow if one reads the asterisks in order and after a full read of this piece, but scrolling over links as one goes will be useful.
* no Emerson
** last link inserted: Maybe way too much of a D'Ribble or G'Ribble?
[Apologies for Neo-Euphemism.]
[Breaking News: Herman Cain will give an "unconventional Endorsement just prior to the South Carolina Primary. (Ctrl F "best" under vent) I hope it is not another one of his tours or projects, but if it is not a third party run or candidate it might be someone from out of the blue if not a write-in. Huntsman or Bachmann also come to mind.]
*** The irony of taxes, GDP and debt. Is it in the charts?
> Previous Post <
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Ideology
The perspective one has of society's creation and one's role in it.***
Not* Exactly[!]
[Ideology and Iowa are a lot like the eye of the needle or camel.(no pun)]
[Perspective: to be processed later more or less...[!]
Speaking of ant or fable TV. Democrats cannot afford to have distractions or liars, just because "the Right" does it. Speaking of irrelative**: ant:Anthony, Ed:Rush,(or Beck Or Reck) Whiner:BaneOr, silver lining:golden rule, objective/subjective ]
* iOWa, iRreleFont? Rachel Maddow discusses the "small i" people. But then, eye had not seen her comments.
** something about relative in regards to the differences in ideologies and personalities on spectrum ofor loopiness on the left or right.
***[Media(sources) a side: wMD: I may go on or take hiatus but the bottomline is the top line is mine. i.e. I have only begun the Mike Cormack book, and I am not quoting it. Ibid this bracket.(Thanks to truthout.org for this last crack, not the book]
[!]Hi Ate Us, interesting Try Angle or Segue(way)[]. Or Tr(eye)i Pod?
A.B.C.D...
Not* Exactly[!]
[Ideology and Iowa are a lot like the eye of the needle or camel.(no pun)]
[Perspective: to be processed later more or less...[!]
Speaking of ant or fable TV. Democrats cannot afford to have distractions or liars, just because "the Right" does it. Speaking of irrelative**: ant:Anthony, Ed:Rush,(or Beck Or Reck) Whiner:BaneOr, silver lining:golden rule, objective/subjective ]
* iOWa, iRreleFont? Rachel Maddow discusses the "small i" people. But then, eye had not seen her comments.
** something about relative in regards to the differences in ideologies and personalities on spectrum ofor loopiness on the left or right.
***[Media(sources) a side: wMD: I may go on or take hiatus but the bottomline is the top line is mine. i.e. I have only begun the Mike Cormack book, and I am not quoting it. Ibid this bracket.(Thanks to truthout.org for this last crack, not the book]
[!]Hi Ate Us, interesting Try Angle or Segue(way)[]. Or Tr(eye)i Pod?
A.B.C.D...
Friday, January 28, 2011
On the level...
playing the field.
It takes three points to determine a plane,
in contrast to the previous cloud.[*]
(silver lining / golden rule)
[Not to mention "transpartisan possibilities" Again thanks to Stephanie Miller.]
[Update More Cow Bell.]
[*] see Oh
It takes three points to determine a plane,
in contrast to the previous cloud.[*]
(silver lining / golden rule)
[Not to mention "transpartisan possibilities" Again thanks to Stephanie Miller.]
[Update More Cow Bell.]
[*] see Oh
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Water under the Bridge!
Not Exactly!
Meanwhile: Questions for Trump!
Will you provide all citizens a silver-spoon in their mouth at birth?
How is your marriage and bankruptcy record an asset in your transition from business to governing?
We know it was not personal bankruptcy, but neither is the government budget operated like a family budget. How would you navigate these discrepancies?
7-30-15
[Seg(~)Way?] Buchanan / Chomski
Meanwhile: Questions for Trump!
Will you provide all citizens a silver-spoon in their mouth at birth?
How is your marriage and bankruptcy record an asset in your transition from business to governing?
We know it was not personal bankruptcy, but neither is the government budget operated like a family budget. How would you navigate these discrepancies?
7-30-15
[Seg(~)Way?] Buchanan / Chomski
Monday, March 21, 2011
There was nothing...
necessarily prophetic meant with Third Time's the Charm. Or was there? It may have been the spin-off of either or and the likes of Beck and some evangelicals. Even just in the either or of "I'm just saying", which might be related to a silver lining, which only has three sides. There is the light, the dark and the actual cloud that matters. [SAVED IN DRAFT & CONTINUED & SUBMITTED 3-22-11) Third Times a Charm, means that if you look right, look left, cross the street, and there is a chicken already on the other side, you may have learned a lesson...or not. Not to be making light of recent tragedies, but that actually is the point. That nuclear energy is not on the same plane as air or traffic accidents. But back to the original point, that Third Times a Charm regards Toning Down the* Lines.
*Or were we?
[SUB-TEXT: the table and I Ron Knee.]
[Update: my original assessment before the air strikes began was that the President was following the letter of the law if not the spirit. I won't get into the spirit of the Patriot Act but is part of the law as well as the 1973 War Powers Act and the constitution. My point being that it is one thing to debate an action by the president, it is another to make a law determining or undermining his powers. Any reassessment will have to take into account the current politics as well as earlier circumstances not to mentiuon the politics then. It is that frame in which I am optimistic that change matters as well as who is in charge.]
[Footnote to power and politics not to mention economics.]
[Not exactly breaking, but one reason going to congress would not make sense. Would it make sense to make doing the right thing even more political? Would it make sense for journalists to be giving detailed intel to an enemy? The right thing being to save lives rather than waiting for a massacre. It can be wondered well why not other places, well then get some consensus, but some are in the past and others may be prevented in the future or nothing may change. And there may be a bonus feature[**] in this turkey on the table and that is the subject of war funding and the budget process or complacency.]
[**] 3-25-11 links added
*Or were we?
[SUB-TEXT: the table and I Ron Knee.]
[Update: my original assessment before the air strikes began was that the President was following the letter of the law if not the spirit. I won't get into the spirit of the Patriot Act but is part of the law as well as the 1973 War Powers Act and the constitution. My point being that it is one thing to debate an action by the president, it is another to make a law determining or undermining his powers. Any reassessment will have to take into account the current politics as well as earlier circumstances not to mentiuon the politics then. It is that frame in which I am optimistic that change matters as well as who is in charge.]
[Footnote to power and politics not to mention economics.]
[Not exactly breaking, but one reason going to congress would not make sense. Would it make sense to make doing the right thing even more political? Would it make sense for journalists to be giving detailed intel to an enemy? The right thing being to save lives rather than waiting for a massacre. It can be wondered well why not other places, well then get some consensus, but some are in the past and others may be prevented in the future or nothing may change. And there may be a bonus feature[**] in this turkey on the table and that is the subject of war funding and the budget process or complacency.]
[**] 3-25-11 links added
Friday, June 10, 2011
No Frackin' Way
Nuclear power is one thing*, but Frackin' with our water?
* not green(except for trickle up)
[What the frack is the connection to Newt Gingrich, well the paradox of green and being able to be a paradox period. His frackin' campaign seems to be burning the candle on both ends. But this is too complex for me to explain, except for the idea that he commits to Lean Six Sigma,*** but not to the concepts his staff thinks it will take to win. Is this a bringing it to the table moment ala the silver lining of the churned media cloud? It is bad enough that Republicans have enough money to run their lies in ads and Faux News, but they have enough to add cloud to the process.]
[Not to** mention lame stream media.]
** way
*** last frackin' link
[Post comments footnote(see my two comments): There is nothing wrong with Six Sigma as a tool, but it may be besides the point, but not aside from the point of whose hands it is in, and for what purpose it is wielded(people or profit). In fact, I believe that "Lean Six Sigma" violates "Six Sigma" principles by having a target of 25% spending reduction, which demonstrates my point on purposes and whose hands should wield it for what. Aside from the point: what the frack is the point of government?]
* not green(except for trickle up)
[What the frack is the connection to Newt Gingrich, well the paradox of green and being able to be a paradox period. His frackin' campaign seems to be burning the candle on both ends. But this is too complex for me to explain, except for the idea that he commits to Lean Six Sigma,*** but not to the concepts his staff thinks it will take to win. Is this a bringing it to the table moment ala the silver lining of the churned media cloud? It is bad enough that Republicans have enough money to run their lies in ads and Faux News, but they have enough to add cloud to the process.]
[Not to** mention lame stream media.]
** way
*** last frackin' link
[Post comments footnote(see my two comments): There is nothing wrong with Six Sigma as a tool, but it may be besides the point, but not aside from the point of whose hands it is in, and for what purpose it is wielded(people or profit). In fact, I believe that "Lean Six Sigma" violates "Six Sigma" principles by having a target of 25% spending reduction, which demonstrates my point on purposes and whose hands should wield it for what. Aside from the point: what the frack is the point of government?]
Monday, August 13, 2007
Air of Inevitability?
I do not wish to imply that it SHOULD BE, Clinton versus Thompson.
Only that if it is, that it BE a rehash of Watergate.
They both have their baggage from that era.
Thompson just noted
Hillary here:
TimesOnLine
TheStar.com
[Posted at the listed time, but continued immediately with the noted pause below]
GuardianUnlimited
TheVastRightWingCon
I am just trying to be "fair and balanced", so I must note that I have not digested all of these sources, and should warn of the potential for food poisoning on the last item. But just [the teaser] of the just prior one is intriguing (paused to read that piece):
Hillary brought to book Watergate veteran Carl Bernstein talks to James Silver about the Clintons, George Bush, and the state of the American press
Having now read it, it is recommended highly.
Just what is the difference between the "vast right wing conspiracy" and the so-called "liberal press"? Only the label. Just what is the difference between trying to rewrite the rules of impeachment and the constitution? Apparently the party and getting away with it.
[Finally concluding approximately 1 hour from original post time: normally I do not note when a post is developed in this manner.(in a sitting) But I also now proceed and borrow from the top link that:
I would change that to SHOULD!]
[Updated Presidential Profile: 9:20 AM - Noting that I have not put much attention to the ratings of the candidates, I now update without comment, but with an aversion to inevitability.
Kucinich
Edwards
Obama
Clark
Richardson
Clinton, Dodd, Biden
Gravel]
Only that if it is, that it BE a rehash of Watergate.
They both have their baggage from that era.
Thompson just noted
Hillary here:
TimesOnLine
TheStar.com
[Posted at the listed time, but continued immediately with the noted pause below]
GuardianUnlimited
TheVastRightWingCon
I am just trying to be "fair and balanced", so I must note that I have not digested all of these sources, and should warn of the potential for food poisoning on the last item. But just [the teaser] of the just prior one is intriguing (paused to read that piece):
Hillary brought to book Watergate veteran Carl Bernstein talks to James Silver about the Clintons, George Bush, and the state of the American press
Having now read it, it is recommended highly.
Just what is the difference between the "vast right wing conspiracy" and the so-called "liberal press"? Only the label. Just what is the difference between trying to rewrite the rules of impeachment and the constitution? Apparently the party and getting away with it.
[Finally concluding approximately 1 hour from original post time: normally I do not note when a post is developed in this manner.(in a sitting) But I also now proceed and borrow from the top link that:
The 2008 Race could not only rehash accountability but the media's role
I would change that to SHOULD!]
[Updated Presidential Profile: 9:20 AM - Noting that I have not put much attention to the ratings of the candidates, I now update without comment, but with an aversion to inevitability.
Kucinich
Edwards
Obama
Clark
Richardson
Clinton, Dodd, Biden
Gravel]
Monday, February 02, 2015
Missed it by that much.
24-28 (**)
Budget may matter. CNBC(4)
Ironies of Empire: Juan Cole
Exclusive w/ Nate Silver
Raw Money Poverty Conversion
Libertarian Hijackers
GOP's Top Hawk(2) by Jim Newell Re: John Bolton - Neo-Manichean[!]*
[Krugman/Dean Economics]
*(Pardon my M-bededness. Italics reference comment and having read.)
** order read (2) .
2-5-15 Re:Pete
Budget may matter. CNBC(4)
Ironies of Empire: Juan Cole
Exclusive w/ Nate Silver
Raw Money Poverty Conversion
Libertarian Hijackers
GOP's Top Hawk(2) by Jim Newell Re: John Bolton - Neo-Manichean[!]*
[Krugman/Dean Economics]
*(Pardon my M-bededness. Italics reference comment and having read.)
** order read (2) .
2-5-15 Re:Pete
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Geometry
Ge Oh Me Try?
WTF?*
It is not about me or any of these people, but...
* no balloon head but silver lining?
[My orginal intent was to reflect some social/organizational/vector dynamics. One word image led to another but that is the point, what the heck is the point, when there are so many pointers let alone parties and perspectives?]
WTF?*
It is not about me or any of these people, but...
* no balloon head but silver lining?
[My orginal intent was to reflect some social/organizational/vector dynamics. One word image led to another but that is the point, what the heck is the point, when there are so many pointers let alone parties and perspectives?]
Thursday, July 22, 2010
C Sick?
CNN may be a cup o'tea.
C Wave... Ouch!
See sea et al...& new careers.
Lawrence O'Donnell (LO Low and behold)
[My original intent was in the LO and behold.]
[... on the other hand, sitting in for Chris is Chuck!(See hosts.)]
[Speaking of Left Behind*]
* I was unable to find the Hardball link which referred to "Left Behind" but the "Left" above is a backlash from the Sherrod "lesson".
[7-23-10 bolds added and note: I am complimenting CNN's coverage of the Sherrod situation, and comparing/contrasting the latest Rangel reaction, as well as Chuck Todd(for Chris Matthews) hosting a conversation. Update "lesson".]
[There may be a silver lining to a Rangel ethics trial, it is about transparency and justice, and politics. Congress can hold their own accountable and demonstrate the hypocrisy of fair and balanced ethics, let alone justice. Some are suggesting he be removed post haste, and that would not serve justice or transparency.]
[Compare and Contrast(no comma)Pragmatism**.]
** to be relinked to later report on extending tax cuts or reform.[Meanwhile*** on the more practical than political.]
*** also breaking: needed link to Dylan Ratigan w/Chris Kofinis on change of business as usual.
C Wave... Ouch!
See sea et al...& new careers.
Lawrence O'Donnell (LO Low and behold)
[My original intent was in the LO and behold.]
[... on the other hand, sitting in for Chris is Chuck!(See hosts.)]
[Speaking of Left Behind*]
* I was unable to find the Hardball link which referred to "Left Behind" but the "Left" above is a backlash from the Sherrod "lesson".
[7-23-10 bolds added and note: I am complimenting CNN's coverage of the Sherrod situation, and comparing/contrasting the latest Rangel reaction, as well as Chuck Todd(for Chris Matthews) hosting a conversation. Update "lesson".]
[There may be a silver lining to a Rangel ethics trial, it is about transparency and justice, and politics. Congress can hold their own accountable and demonstrate the hypocrisy of fair and balanced ethics, let alone justice. Some are suggesting he be removed post haste, and that would not serve justice or transparency.]
[Compare and Contrast(no comma)Pragmatism**.]
** to be relinked to later report on extending tax cuts or reform.[Meanwhile*** on the more practical than political.]
*** also breaking: needed link to Dylan Ratigan w/Chris Kofinis on change of business as usual.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Churned Media
Now that's the ticket!
"Earned Media" was the term that Sharon Angle malappropriated, but this is the punchline to my wave theory* of the mess age and the difficult dynamics of what is on the table.
* the squeaky wheel gets the oil, I mean media.
[Trump to Reality (Or Eye of The Tiger?)
Translation: Maybe I am looking for a silver lining, but is The Donald potentially the Nixon to China in all this dark matter.]
[Now what about Re-Birthers? By Jingo. Not to mention. And I am not talking Manchurian Candidate. SEGUE I think I had better take a double Sabbatical, for "business reasons" and for cleaning up this act.]
[Content, Con Tent, Content / C Labels]
"Earned Media" was the term that Sharon Angle malappropriated, but this is the punchline to my wave theory* of the mess age and the difficult dynamics of what is on the table.
* the squeaky wheel gets the oil, I mean media.
[Trump to Reality (Or Eye of The Tiger?)
Translation: Maybe I am looking for a silver lining, but is The Donald potentially the Nixon to China in all this dark matter.]
[Now what about Re-Birthers? By Jingo. Not to mention. And I am not talking Manchurian Candidate. SEGUE I think I had better take a double Sabbatical, for "business reasons" and for cleaning up this act.]
[Content, Con Tent, Content / C Labels]
Monday, October 01, 2012
Simon says 2 point or...?
2 the N'th of infinity.
Simulphile:
A: The Hill on Benghazi-gate.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f .
g .*
h .
i .
j .
...
Z: Stench to the N'th.
* preemptive asterisk speaking of ...
(Work in progress A-G-Z, not to Simonize but to file for later.)
To pre-paraphrase or Simon-eyes. Will Romney have a debate winning joke?
Will the Republicans in congress do to foreign policy what they have to the economy?
Choose partisanship uber politics?**
[Footnotes under construction, meanwhile rolling blog search: Bully Pour-Mitt, or ... (7-4 to 6-6 )]
**[10-2-12] Thanks to my Bane or Tan Gents, I almost forgot the punchline. Will an attempt at humor have us laughing with Romney or at Romney? Of course might be directed at Obama but will it be with us or against us? I can't rule out self-depricating humor but I don't think that will really help him given his etch-a-sketch leaks. But Walking like an Egyptian Bush will not really do any of us any good.
NOW: Exception to the Rule? Fox / Hedge-hog metaphor? (Nate Silver) Not to parse(hyphenate) a pun on hedgehog, nor out FOX the chicken-hawks.
[I'm not sure I would suggest to the President pinning the V(for victim) on the Robbin'Hoods, but pinning the C (for compromise) on the Dawn Keys might work with almost anything regarding economics. So try to nail the tale on the pool cue or magic 8 ball.]
(fn) [post footnote: Andrea Mitchell Reports Robert Gibbs on the math.]
Simulphile:
A: The Hill on Benghazi-gate.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f .
g .*
h .
i .
j .
...
Z: Stench to the N'th.
* preemptive asterisk speaking of ...
(Work in progress A-G-Z, not to Simonize but to file for later.)
To pre-paraphrase or Simon-eyes. Will Romney have a debate winning joke?
Will the Republicans in congress do to foreign policy what they have to the economy?
Choose partisanship uber politics?**
[Footnotes under construction, meanwhile rolling blog search: Bully Pour-Mitt, or ... (7-4 to 6-6 )]
**[10-2-12] Thanks to my Bane or Tan Gents, I almost forgot the punchline. Will an attempt at humor have us laughing with Romney or at Romney? Of course might be directed at Obama but will it be with us or against us? I can't rule out self-depricating humor but I don't think that will really help him given his etch-a-sketch leaks. But Walking like an Egyptian Bush will not really do any of us any good.
NOW: Exception to the Rule? Fox / Hedge-hog metaphor? (Nate Silver) Not to parse(hyphenate) a pun on hedgehog, nor out FOX the chicken-hawks.
[I'm not sure I would suggest to the President pinning the V(for victim) on the Robbin'Hoods, but pinning the C (for compromise) on the Dawn Keys might work with almost anything regarding economics. So try to nail the tale on the pool cue or magic 8 ball.]
(fn) [post footnote: Andrea Mitchell Reports Robert Gibbs on the math.]
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Breaking or
Peripatetic Justice and Ledership let alone
an achronism ?
This is a ramble on the Wave, aka the 4th Estate as well as a hint for a Ribble. No pun on Reliable Sources but I could have more reliable spelling but not an achronism.
I won't mess with the mutliple bottom lines* but it is about change and finding a silver lining. Changing my procedures will be job one, but as for this content note the bold italics. This is a preemptive note, before I take the time to more fully process the SOTU.
Foot note: fourwords for the two word culture - bane or con text
* last links added: period/pause
[Woof! Ratings are now in for the SOTU, and here are two ecumenical references. Rachel Maddow, a "prayer for the free-market" from as Joe Scarborough put it "the Cardinal". Who let the CEO's out! Speaking of "genre" note the connection to CNN.]
an achronism ?
This is a ramble on the Wave, aka the 4th Estate as well as a hint for a Ribble. No pun on Reliable Sources but I could have more reliable spelling but not an achronism.
I won't mess with the mutliple bottom lines* but it is about change and finding a silver lining. Changing my procedures will be job one, but as for this content note the bold italics. This is a preemptive note, before I take the time to more fully process the SOTU.
Foot note: fourwords for the two word culture - bane or con text
* last links added: period/pause
[Woof! Ratings are now in for the SOTU, and here are two ecumenical references. Rachel Maddow, a "prayer for the free-market" from as Joe Scarborough put it "the Cardinal". Who let the CEO's out! Speaking of "genre" note the connection to CNN.]
Friday, May 30, 2014
Saturday, January 15, 2011
What is ledership?
Is it really the press? In first amendment terms it might be. This is no pun on spelling, but it maybe hits on being able to follow and keep our freedoms.
Ribble: Actually it might be a pun on spelling, or just looking for a silver lining. Speaking of which, I am sure I have a few to be corrected.
BTW: If you are a bit tuckered out by this, then maybe get out of the kitchen? But I lay no claim to being an original intender but...
Ribble: Actually it might be a pun on spelling, or just looking for a silver lining. Speaking of which, I am sure I have a few to be corrected.
BTW: If you are a bit tuckered out by this, then maybe get out of the kitchen? But I lay no claim to being an original intender but...
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Tuesday, August 01, 2006
Hatred Hits Home:
6 Shot at Jewish office is the Seattle Times headline on Saturday morning.
Gumman "said he hates Israel" : was a subheading.
Sunday: Community responds with sorrow, unity
Subheading: Rabbi Mirel: Hatred will not be our legacy
Sometimes people are skeptical of the metaphor that "Every cloud has a silver lining", but sometimes it is just a must that we take good from evil.
Gumman "said he hates Israel" : was a subheading.
Sunday: Community responds with sorrow, unity
Subheading: Rabbi Mirel: Hatred will not be our legacy
Sometimes people are skeptical of the metaphor that "Every cloud has a silver lining", but sometimes it is just a must that we take good from evil.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)